HOME | WHAT IS SOCIO TIMES? | CONTRIBUTE | ARCHIVES |
Pete Kendall's Socio Times: A Socionomic Commentary
CULTURAL TRENDS | SOCIAL CHANGE | MARKETS | ECONOMY | POLITICS


BREAKING NEWS
November 8, 2006
Resurgent Democrats Win Control of House
 House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. celebrates with Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-WASHINGTON - Democrats won control of the House early Wednesday after a dozen years of Republican rule in a resounding repudiation of a war, a president and a scandal-scarred Congress.

"From sea to shining sea, the American people voted for change," declared Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the hard-charging California Democrat in line to become the nation's first female House speaker.

"Today we have made history," she said.

Lameduck Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., was elected to an 11th term, but several GOP officials said they expected him to step down as party leader and possibly even retire from Congress.

The White House made plans for President Bush to call the speaker-in-waiting, Pelosi, first thing in the morning; he will enter his final two years in office with at least half of Congress in the opposition party's hands.

"It's been kind of tough out there," Hastert said. Presidential spokesman Tony Snow observed: "It's not like a slap on the forehead kind of shock."

By 5:15 a.m. Wednesday, Democrats had won 228 seats, enough for control, and were leading for another 4, which would give them 232. Republicans, who hold 229 seats in the current House, won 193 and were leading in another 10, which would give them 203.

Democrats had captured 27 Republican-controlled seats, and no Democratic incumbent had lost thus far. Races were too close to call in more than a dozen seats, making it impossible to determine exactly how large the Democratic margin would be.

Still, 2006 already was an eerie reversal of 1994, when the GOP gained 54 seats in a wave that toppled Democrats after four decades. No Republican incumbent lost that year.

This time, Republicans fell from power in every region of the country - conservative, liberal and moderate - as well as in every type of district - urban, rural and suburban. Exit polls showed middle class voters who fled to the GOP a dozen years ago appeared to return to the Democrats.

Ethics woes, the war and overall anger toward Bush appeared to drive voters to the Democrats, according to surveys by The Associated Press and the television networks of voters as they left voting places. Several traditionally hard-fought demographic groups were choosing Democrats, including independents, moderates, and suburban women.

Two out of three voters called the war very important to them and said they leaned toward the Democrats, while six in ten voters said they disapproved of the war. For months, national surveys showed Democrats favored over Republicans by margins unseen since 1990 as voters grew restless with the Bush administration and seemed more ready to end one-party rule on Capitol Hill.
Associated Press


April 2007
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

« Previous | Main Page | Next »

The Year Things Changed on the Campaign Trail
Category: POLITICS
By: Pete Kendall, November 8, 2006
Probably by the Congressional election in 2006 and certainly by the Presidential election in 2008, the electorate’s seething desire to “throw the bums out” will completely reshape the political landscape.
The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, October 2005

elephantitisA complete re-shaping? Certainly not, but given the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s lofty perch above 12,000, 2006’s “winds of change” mark a powerful start toward the reshaped political landscape that The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast anticipated more than a year ago. The consensus remark with respect to the markets is that the Democratic shift is bullish because it will gridlock the lawmaking apparatus. This sentiment is supported by the Dow’s 13% rally from July to early November. But the market action can be deceiving around elections. In the seven weeks leading up to 1994’s Republican Revolution, for instance, the DJIA fell about 4%. Once the election was over, it fell another 4% through November 23. From that low of 3638.97, however, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 220% over the next five years.

Several aspect of the 2006 race, suggest that it will be also be a marker of a historic reversal – this time into a long decline.  In addition to it’s movement against the ruling party and President and the record success of female candidates (see today's other entry); there is 2006’s “mirror image” to the politics of 1994. The term is taken from the pre-election analysis of Dr. G. Terry Madonna, a professor of public affairs at Franklin and Marshall College and Dr. Michael Young, managing partner of Michael Young Strategic Research who also state:
But now exactly 12 years later, the gains made possible by the conservative 1994 revolution are in jeopardy in another mid-term election. Nationally, Republicans in 2006 are in the throes of an electoral meltdown just as Democrats were in 1994.

As in 1994, the US House and possibly the Senate seem increasingly likely to switch parties. As in 1994, an unpopular president and his unpopular policies are feeding the fire engulfing his party. And as in 1994, it is desertion of the ruling coalition by moderate and independent voters that provides the crucial catalyst that may sweep the ruling party from power.

Candidates like conservative Rick Santorum, who led the Republican’s into office in 1994 are leading the way out in 2006. Pennsylvania Senator Santorum was soundly beaten by Democratic candidate Bob Casey, Jr. The simmering hostility of Pennsylvania voters is something EWFF touched on back in October 2005 (see Additional References below). Another political pressure point that EWFF covered in September 2005 was Arnold Schwarzenegger’s bid for re-election in California. As we noted here on October 16, Schwarzenegger turned his fortunes around by completely changing his stripes from Republican to Democrat. Last but not least, there’s Eliot Spitzer’s successful bid for the governorship of New York, which was anticipated here on September 13. Spitzer won in a landslide with 70% of the vote. New York’s election of the great Wall Street crime fighter to the office of governor is another 180-degree flip from the 1994 experience when George Pataki defeated Democrat Mario Cuomo. Spitzer now replaces Pataki. His campaign slogan, “Day 1: Everything Changes,” should be more accurate than he or anyone else imagines.

Additional References
October 2005, EWFF
At the state and local level, populist fervor is rising. In Pennsylvania, after the state legislature voted itself a “middle of the night pay raise” in July, a wave of outrage hit the newspapers and airwaves. Since a similar whiff of fury failed to amount to anything in 1995, few Pennsylvanians “predicted the level of hostility or how long it could simmer.” “The political establishment in Harrisburg underestimated the unifying power of outrage,” said the coordinator of a September 28 protest rally. In California, politicians are scratching their heads over the emergence of “grumpy voters. As they look around them and toward the future, residents of the Golden State are turning gloomy. By a 2-to-1 margin, registered voters in California say the state’s economy is now in ‘bad times’ rather than good.” In a “stunning drop,” the approval rating of action hero turned California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is down to 31%. “The word I hear most from business people is ‘surprise’ that he has squandered so much of his political capital and their money,” said a Republican political consultant. This is nothing. Probably by the Congressional election in 2006 and certainly by the Presidential election in 2008, the electorate’s seething desire to “throw the bums out” will completely reshape the political landscape.
Post a comment




(you may use HTML tags for style)

RECENT ARTICLES
April 16, 2007
Does Imus Cancellation Radio a Bear Market Signal?
read more
April 12, 2007
One Small Coffee Shop Uprising for Starbucks, a Grande Leap for Labor
read more
April 11, 2007
Dazzling Finish: Cars Bring Once-Boring Shades To Life
read more
April 10, 2007
T in T-Line Stands for Top
read more
April 5, 2007
The Fight for a Free Vermont? Must be a Big, Big Turn
read more

ARTICLE COMMENTS
Maybe losing this election was the best things the Republicans could hope for so they are positioned to retake congress in 2008.
Posted by: Mikhail
November 8, 2006 02:42 PM



HOME | WHAT IS SOCIO TIMES? | CONTRIBUTE | SEARCH    Copyright © 2024 | Privacy Policy | Report Site Issues