« Previous | Main Page | Next »

Looks like (at least for now) the solar system officially has a Fibonacci eight planets.

(I am reminded of a section in one of your Socionomics books that stated that some ancient mathemeticians/astronomers predicted the existence of eight planets without the use of telescopes.)
--Wes Masuda

This one has a little of everything from our perspective. In addition to reducing the field to a Fibonacci 8 as you suggest, there’s elements of conflict “dissenters plan a counteroffensive,” deflation and the overturning of a scientific consensus that held through every bit of the Supercycle V (1932-2000). The vote is being hailed as “a victory of scientific reasoning over historic and cultural influences.” And then of course, there is the “dramatic shift” from a expanding solar system of 12 planets just a few days ago to a contracting one of 8. Why the sudden urge to come to a scientifically consistent consensus? We can only think of one. Scientists are not immune to the reality the contracting social forces that are now unfolding. They are taking the opportunity to re-define the solar system even though it means abandoning a “sentimental” attachment to Pluto. A similar demotion happened once before. Ceres was officially listed as a planet when it was discovered in 1801. A half century later, however, when a large-degree bear market, Supercyle (II), was in force, Ceres was busted down to the rank of planetoid. So, it appears to be true; there really is nothing new under the sun.

As for the reference you mentioned, I can’t seem to find it. But Additional References below covers some more cosmic Fibonacci relationships.  

The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior
Fibonacci in the Heavens
If Linde’s description of the universe is accurate, then the universe is a branching structure. That branching structure could be an arborum. As shown in Chapter 3, arbora reflect phi both in the multiplication of their arba and in the most common angle of furcation, 36 degrees.

Behind Einasto’s description of the arrangement of superclusters as being like “a cosmic crystal” lies the possibility that their arrangement may actually be like a quasi-crystal. In the early 1980s, Daniel Shechtman of Technion in Haifa, Israel, discovered a type of crystal that contains spiral arrangements and is governed by Fibonacci mathematics. Initially believed impossible, the quasi-crystal has been verified by photographs made with an electron microscope. The quasi-crystal exhibits “five-fold symmetry,” which means that a single rotation of the crystal exposed to an X-ray produces a symmetrical scattering pattern five times.

While these are pure speculations, there is some concrete evidence of Fibonacci mathematics at work in our solar system. The September/October 1989 issue of Cycles magazine reports that the solar sunspot cycle of 10.88 years is skewed in time so that the average time from maximum to minimum sunspot activity is 6.80 years and the average time from there back to maximum activity is 4.08 years.15 The ratios of each phase to the whole cycle are .625 and .375, which are 5/8 and 3/8, ratios of Fibonacci numbers.

While there is considerable latitude in the ratios (.547, .656, .724 and .536), it is also the case that the average mean ratios of the distances of adjacent planets among the first six planets from the sun, excluding the Mars/Jupiter relationship, is .615, the Fibonacci ratio. The Mars/Jupiter separation is so great as to imply by this numerology that there is a missing planet between them. That is where the asteroids are located. The Titius-Bode Law, developed in 1766, recognized these relationships and correctly predicted the position of the next planet, Uranus.

In 1986, The New York Times printed a picture of the ten-mile-long nucleus of Halley’s comet. An alert subscriber of mine noted its skewed appearance, measured its two lengths and found that they are in Fibonacci relationship.

The Elliott Wave Principle
Besides their significant frequency, there is reason to believe that Fibonacci numbers and ratios of time units in the stock market are something other than numerology. For one thing, natural time units are related to the Fibonacci sequence. There are 365.24 days in a year, just shy of 377. There are 12.37 lunar cycles in a year, just shy of 13. The ratios between these actual numbers and Fibonacci numbers are .9688 and .9515. When the Earth’s orbit and rotation were faster, these numbers would have been concurrently quite close to actual Fibonacci numbers. (Might the solar system have begun its periodicities at those frequencies?)