HOME | WHAT IS SOCIO TIMES? | CONTRIBUTE | ARCHIVES |
Pete Kendall's Socio Times: A Socionomic Commentary
CULTURAL TRENDS | SOCIAL CHANGE | MARKETS | ECONOMY | POLITICS


BREAKING NEWS
June 26, 2006
Energy Drinks Work Perhaps Too Well 
With intense designs resembling the tattooed arm of an intimidating biker, some energy drink cans look like they could literally deliver the punch they promise. While the contents may not cause as much physical damage, some nutritionists warn young people about drinking too much of the trendy products.

"They wake you up, they let you stay out later, they let you beat a hangover. They're basically like coffee for a young person," said Jeffrey Klineman, editor of Beverage Spectrum, a publication that tracks the non-alcoholic beverage industry. "It's amazing to see how quickly this has become an established beverage."

But nutritionist Richard DeAndrea thinks their addictive quality is the real reason for energy drinks' rapid growth in popularity. "These things throw the body way off," said DeAndrea, a nutritionist for the Akasha Center for Integrative Medicine in Santa Monica. He urges people to avoid energy drinks almost entirely.

According to Beverage Digest, another publication that tracks the nonalcoholic beverage industry, energy drinks have exploded into a $3 billion dollar a year industry - not bad for a category that didn't exist just six years ago. The United States alone boasts more than 1,000 brands of energy drinks.
San Gabriel Valley Tribune


April 2007
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

« Previous | Main Page | Next »

A Look Behind the New Attack on Energy Drinks
Category: CULTURAL TRENDS
By: Pete Kendall, June 29, 2006
As in [the peak stock market years of] 1906 and 1968, much of Coca-Cola’s turmoil is rooted in emotional fears about food.
The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, December 1999

First of all, thanks to Kevin Depew and Scott Reamer of Minyanville.com for pointing out the peak mood significance of energy drinks. Here’s Scott’s analysis: "Nothing better than a product one can purchase to allay the physical and emotional manifestations of the growing bear trend: listlessness, lethargy, etc. But in terms of risk-seeking, this type of energy drink is, in actuality, (as the 'health professionals' lament) quite risky and in the end will achieve the very thing it seeks to prevent.”

The energy drink phenomenon fits so well with the current juncture. We'll probably cover it in a future issue of The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast. The quickening attacks reminds us of what happened to another bull market beverage, Coca-Cola, right before the Dow’s all-time high in 2000. As we noted above, for some reason, fears about food and drink tend to appear near large-degree tops in social mood. Since energy drinks are one of the ways people appear to hold it together through the frenzied pace of an extreme in bullish psychology, it makes sense that they would become a focus of anxiety and “concern” in the reversal. For a glimpse of their future, energy drink makers should study Coca-Cola’s history of bear market troubles (see Additional References and Sociotimes entries July 15, 2005, December 30, 2005, May 4 ).

In an echo of two earlier peak moments when the social mood was at a similar juncture a June 22 USA Today review of a new book, Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair, revisits the author "Who Created a Rumble with 1906 'Jungle' Exposing  Meatpacker Horrors." The article notes that Sinclair near the end of his life and the peak of 1968, Sinclair met with LBJ at the White House at the signing of the Wholesale Meat Act in December 1967. "I sort of felt that two historic consumer ages were meeting – Upton Sinclair and I were together in the White House," said Nadar of the occasion. USA Today suggests that they appear to be meeting again as Fast Food Nation (2001) and Super Size Me (2004) are "making people think about what they eat." The Jungle is "depressingly relavant" says an author. "The story we tell ourselves is those were the bad old days. There may been a time when it did get better, but now we're back."

Additional References
December 1999, EWFF
Food Fights and The Seattle Mob
As in 1906 and 1968, much of Coca-Cola’s turmoil is rooted in emotional fears about food. The campaign against genetically engineered “Frankenfoods,” which people have been consuming for years with no evidence of harmful side effects, started in Europe and spread to the U.S. in recent weeks. As in 1908 and 1969, government hearings have been called to discuss the health risk in food. “The second of three FDA hearings on the safety and regulation of biotech foods is expected to be as contentious as the first meeting [on] November 18.” “Growing resistance to new technology” has prompted the public forums. At the World Trade Organization conference in Seattle, protestors attacked a McDonalds, smashing its windows and unfurling a banner protesting the genetic engineering of food. Nobody seems to know what triggered the wave of irrational fears but many are taking action. “Once Quick Converts, Farmers Begin To Lose Faith In Biotech Crops.” Even when the “customer is wrong, the customer is right,” says a farmer who has decided not to plant genetically modified seed next year.
Post a comment




(you may use HTML tags for style)

RECENT ARTICLES
April 16, 2007
Does Imus Cancellation Radio a Bear Market Signal?
read more
April 12, 2007
One Small Coffee Shop Uprising for Starbucks, a Grande Leap for Labor
read more
April 11, 2007
Dazzling Finish: Cars Bring Once-Boring Shades To Life
read more
April 10, 2007
T in T-Line Stands for Top
read more
April 5, 2007
The Fight for a Free Vermont? Must be a Big, Big Turn
read more

ARTICLE COMMENTS


HOME | WHAT IS SOCIO TIMES? | CONTRIBUTE | SEARCH    Copyright © 2024 | Privacy Policy | Report Site Issues